Re: Improved scanner performance

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improved scanner performance
Date: 2002-04-20 04:26:51
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0204200025080.687-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> I had the idea that -CF would enlarge the lexer tables quite a bit ---
> what's the change in executable size?)

+150 kB

I've also looked at -CFe, which is supposedly the next slowest level, but
it doesn't do nearly as well.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2002-04-20 04:55:38 Re: general design question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-04-20 04:16:15 Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE