Re: Formatted man pages

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Formatted man pages
Date: 2002-02-22 05:57:30
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0202220054490.683-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > Oh, so it is in the main tarball and not in the docs tarball?
> >
> > Yeah, because that's where the programs are that the man pages document.
>
> But shouldn't it be in the doc tarball too?

You could argue for them being in the docs tarball, but not for "too",
because these tarballs must be nonoverlapping (and you need to main
tarball anyway to do anything with the others).

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Viktor Vislobokov 2002-02-22 11:01:02 PostgreSQL FAQ (new version)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-22 05:56:06 Re: Formatted man pages