Re: contrib idea

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib idea
Date: 2001-12-22 08:30:47
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0112212344490.628-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Don Baccus writes:

> Not only that but it's non standard ... people porting code over which
> correctly defines an explicit index when appropriate would end up with
> two of them.

Not that there's anything remotely standard about indexes...

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-12-22 15:52:37 Re: Possible bug in vacuum redo
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2001-12-21 21:44:16 Re: contrib idea