Re: Licensing

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Licensing
Date: 2001-12-06 19:31:04
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0112061757000.619-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ross J. Reedstrom writes:

> Yeah, a quick search on freshmet.net found TinyScheme and KSI Scheme as
> candidates for an embeddable Scheme interpreter. KSI is described as
> 'well documented: but the doumentation is in Russian'

Several months ago I looked to do exactly what Doug is proposing now.
There are a few dozen(!) freely available scheme implementations out there
that claim to be embeddable, but I haven't found a single one that a)
compiled cleanly, b) was documented, and c) could be used in a way that
wouldn't require changing the postmaster startup code. Most scheme
implementations play weird tricks with the stack for efficiency, but I
don't want that kind of thing in PostgreSQL.

Good luck anyway. ;-)

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-12-06 20:01:35 Re: Intermediate report for AIX 5L port
Previous Message mlw 2001-12-06 18:28:04 Remote connections?