Re: CallableStatements

From: Stuart Robinson <stuart(at)zapata(dot)org>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CallableStatements
Date: 2001-11-26 18:40:52
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0111261039040.21885-100000@dreamingamerica.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

But if you use the executeUpdate method, you'll get an error, because it
isn't expecting a result, no? So, how do you call a stored procedure using
executeUpdate?

-Stuart

On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Barry Lind wrote:

> Stuart,
>
> All stored procedures in postgres return a result. You can however
> ignore the result.
>
> --Barry
>
>
> Stuart Robinson wrote:
>
> > But what do you do if you want to call a stored procedure and NOT get a
> > result?
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Barry Lind wrote:
> >
> >
> >>As Dave has said, since stored procedures in Postgres can only return a
> >>single value, there is little to be gained from CallableStatements that
> >>you can't already do with regular Statements or PreparedStatements.
> >>
> >>The way to call stored procedures in postgres is via a select statement.
> >> Thus to call procedure foo(), you would issue the query 'select
> >>foo()'. Since this is a standard select statement, you can use either a
> >>regular Statement or PreparedStatement to get the result of this stored
> >>procedure.
> >>
> >>Having said that, if you wanted to contribute a CallableStatement
> >>implementation for postgres we would be glad to accept it. Remember
> >>that this is an open source project, features get added by people who
> >>want or need them. If you need CallableStatements implement them an
> >>submit a patch.
> >>
> >>thanks,
> >>--Barry
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Dave Cramer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Well, given that postgres doesn't support the notion of returning a
> >>>result set from a stored procedure; I'm not sure what benefit this would
> >>>be.
> >>>
> >>>Regards,
> >>>
> >>>Dave
> >>>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >>>[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> >>>email(at)gregorybittar(dot)com
> >>>Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 6:47 PM
> >>>To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >>>Subject: [JDBC] CallableStatements
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>CallableStatements weren't in Postgres as of the last time I checked,
> >>>version 7.1.
> >>>
> >>>The JDBC specification has lots of goodies in it, such as examining a
> >>>server's metadata and sending cursors backwards and forwards over result
> >>>sets. However, from the perspective of a Java programmer,
> >>>CallableStatements are essential tools for communicating with a database
> >>>server.
> >>>
> >>>Without the benefit of CallableStatements, all efforts at efficiency are
> >>>wasted. The hallmark of any robust system is distributed processing,
> >>>which requires invoking stored procedures on foreign machines. Doing so
> >>>through CallableStatements would
> >>>(a) accomplish work and (b) retrieve a result code in one logical
> >>>network transmission. Without CallableStatements, retrieving the result
> >>>code not only requires more programming infrastructure, but also taxes
> >>>the application at runtime as the Java application tries to discover
> >>>what the result of the stored procedure was. This method requires an
> >>>additional deletion to purge the logged result code record, lest the log
> >>>grow, slowing searches. Therefore, we are looking at considerably more
> >>>processing done, 2 or 3 transmissions, where 1 should suffice.
> >>>
> >>>Consequently, I would hope that CallableStatements are recognized as a
> >>>very important part of the JDBC puzzle.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >>>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> >>> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >>>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> >>>subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> >>>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >>
> >>http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>

--
Stuart Robinson [stuart(at)zapata(dot)org]
http://www.nerdindustries.com
http://www.tzeltal.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-11-26 18:45:14 Re: JDBC bug?
Previous Message Barry Lind 2001-11-26 18:39:45 Re: CallableStatements