From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Rich Morin <rdm(at)cfcl(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Documentation nits |
Date: | 2001-11-15 16:13:41 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0111151655370.633-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Rich Morin writes:
> PostreSQL 7.1 Administrator's Guide
>
> On page iii (2nd line), something is printing as a square (?).
Could you give some context? I don't have the specific document at hand.
> PostreSQL 7.1 Developer's Guide
>
> The Arabic page numbers do not match the actual page numbers for
> "List of Tables" and "List of Examples".
> PostreSQL 7.1 Programmer's Guide
>
> The Arabic page numbers do not match the actual page numbers for
> "List of Tables" , "List of Figures", and "List of Examples". Also,
> there seem to be two sequences of Arabic page numbers (e.g., the
> Preface is not the first item, yet it is listed as Page "i").
I've found that the Arabic page numbers in the front matter don't work
correctly. I think I have this fixed for the 7.2 release, but it's a
combination of a newer stylesheet release, patches yet to be included in
an even newer stylesheet release, plus the new PG customization layer, so
it might be a bit hard to reproduce for outsiders.
> PostreSQL 7.1 Reference Manual
>
> Certain entries in the Table of Contents are exdented slightly
> (alternatively, the other entries may be indented slightly :-):
>
> CHECKPOINT, RESET, SET, SET CONSTRAINTS, SET TRANSACTION, SHOW,
> createdb, createuser, etc.
I vote for indented. I can see the issue from a theoretical point of
view, but it doesn't appear to happen with the newer toolchain I have
here. Will have to watch this.
> PostreSQL 7.1 User's Guide
>
> The Arabic page numbers do not start with the first page of the
> document; the "Table of Contents" should be on page "iii". Also,
> there seem to be two sequences of Arabic page numbers (e.g., the
> Preface is not the first item, yet it is listed as Page "i").
>
> In Table 3-10, the text is jammed up against the lefthand rules.
Peculiar.
> On page 53 (3rd line), something is printing as a square (?).
Again, some context would help me find this faster.
Thanks for those reports.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rich Morin | 2001-11-15 17:07:01 | Re: Documentation nits |
Previous Message | Josep M. L. Orriols | 2001-11-15 09:29:16 | Hi from Spain... |