Re: compiling libpq++ on Solaris with Sun SPRO6U2 (fixed

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, Denis A Ustimenko <denis(at)oldham(dot)ru>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: compiling libpq++ on Solaris with Sun SPRO6U2 (fixed
Date: 2001-11-11 15:41:18
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0111111546120.647-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Was this resolved and applied?

No. The proposed patch should still be applied.

>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Lee Kindness writes:
> >
> > > 1. The patch will not harm Sun compilers which do support -Wl
> > > 2. It will help those who do not
> > > 3. We need to investigate which versions do/don't support the option,
> > > it seems odd that (my) V4 compiler does not and Denis's V6.2
> > > doesn't but I imagine Peter Eisentraut's does...
> >
> > Okay, I figured it out:
> >
> > The Solaris C compiler uses -Wl to pass options to the linker (like
> > everyone else). But the Solaris C++ compiler uses '-Qoption ld' to pass
> > options to the linker. Words are not sufficient...
> >
> > So I guess that this patch is okay if you can assert that #1 above is
> > true. If it isn't we'll find out soon enough.
> >
> > --
> > Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org
> >
>
>

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-11-11 16:49:47 Re: Bug #513: union all changes char(3) column definition
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2001-11-11 15:41:04 Re: Diff/Patch integration -> SQL cvs clone