Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-23 20:41:36
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0110232221220.642-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Barry Lind writes:

> If we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my
> objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) goes
> away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other
> reasons you mention.

My problem with Ant isn't primarily the availability or what's standard or
not. My problem is simply that it doesn't work the way I want the build
system to work (see recently listed issues such as exit status and
multiple build dirs). If we can get these fixed then I have no problem,
but otherwise Ant introduces bugs into the build system and those will be
fixed, no matter what's the standard today.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-10-23 21:17:10 Re: JDBC issues for JDK1.4
Previous Message Gunnar Rønning 2001-10-23 19:44:13 Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration