Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-23 20:41:36
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0110232221220.642-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Barry Lind writes:

> If we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my
> objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) goes
> away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other
> reasons you mention.

My problem with Ant isn't primarily the availability or what's standard or
not.  My problem is simply that it doesn't work the way I want the build
system to work (see recently listed issues such as exit status and
multiple build dirs).  If we can get these fixed then I have no problem,
but otherwise Ant introduces bugs into the build system and those will be
fixed, no matter what's the standard today.

Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Barry LindDate: 2001-10-23 21:17:10
Subject: Re: JDBC issues for JDK1.4
Previous:From: Gunnar RønningDate: 2001-10-23 19:44:13
Subject: Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group