Re: Snaptshot appears fine to me ...

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Snaptshot appears fine to me ...
Date: 2001-10-15 19:27:27
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0110152121270.631-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier writes:

> Right now, from what I can tell, the snapshot looks great to me:
>
> postgresql# ls -lt
> total 486
> drwxrwxrwx 15 pgsql pgsql 512 Oct 15 04:04 src
> drwxrwxrwx 43 pgsql pgsql 1024 Oct 15 04:04 contrib
> drwxrwxrwx 4 pgsql pgsql 512 Oct 15 04:04 doc
> drwxrwxrwx 2 pgsql pgsql 512 Oct 15 04:04 config
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 pgsql pgsql 249153 Oct 14 04:00 configure
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pgsql pgsql 35886 Oct 13 04:01 configure.in
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pgsql pgsql 132689 Oct 13 04:01 HISTORY
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pgsql pgsql 700 Oct 2 10:21 register.txt
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pgsql pgsql 34643 Oct 1 13:46 INSTALL
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pgsql pgsql 3464 Sep 17 19:00 GNUmakefile.in
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pgsql pgsql 566 Aug 26 18:28 aclocal.m4
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pgsql pgsql 1928 May 10 21:46 README
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pgsql pgsql 1432 Feb 9 2001 Makefile
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pgsql pgsql 1189 Jan 24 2001 COPYRIGHT
>
> All fresh dates ...

The problem was that some of the (sub-)tarballs had old dates, not what
happened to the files within.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-10-15 21:02:11 Re: schema support, was Package support for Postgres
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2001-10-15 19:23:47 Re: Snaptshot appears fine to me ...