Tom Lane writes:
> I believe that ipcclean is no longer needed for preparing to start a new
> postmaster. It might possibly be useful if you wanted to clean up after
> a dead postmaster that you did *not* intend to restart.
> However, given the lack of portability and lack of robustness of the
> script (including inability to deal with multiple-postmaster
> situations), I think I'd vote for removing it altogether.
Can other people voice their opinions what to do with ipcclean?
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-08-28 16:34:16|
|Subject: Re: libpq++ current sources don't compile with older C++ compilers|
|Previous:||From: Alex Pilosov||Date: 2001-08-28 15:35:06|
|Subject: Re: Upcoming events |