| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Status of ipcclean |
| Date: | 2001-08-28 15:38:39 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0108281736300.699-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> I believe that ipcclean is no longer needed for preparing to start a new
> postmaster. It might possibly be useful if you wanted to clean up after
> a dead postmaster that you did *not* intend to restart.
>
> However, given the lack of portability and lack of robustness of the
> script (including inability to deal with multiple-postmaster
> situations), I think I'd vote for removing it altogether.
Can other people voice their opinions what to do with ipcclean?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-28 16:34:16 | Re: libpq++ current sources don't compile with older C++ compilers |
| Previous Message | Alex Pilosov | 2001-08-28 15:35:06 | Re: Upcoming events |