Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date: 2001-08-15 21:29:03
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0108152326510.677-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian writes:

> > Hmm... I used to be able to build in a separate tree than my source
> > tree. Since this patch was applied, I can't. It seems that the
> > preprocessor is finding the system md5.h (i.e. /usr/include/md5.h)
> > rather than the PostgreSQL md5.h. Suggestions on how to fix?

I kind of doubt that, since the new code does #include "libpq/md5.h".

> Ewe, you have md5.h somewhere else. Let me rename it to pgmd5.h. Is
> that OK for everyone? Or maybe I should move it all into crypt.h. That
> seems to make more sense.

No, the problem is that you are not supposed to have include files in the
backend subtree. I'm surprised the code builds at all.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Padgett 2001-08-15 21:30:17 Re: Fix for fetchone() and fetchmany() in Python interface
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-15 21:26:42 Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords