Re: Re: JDBC 2.0 conformance, documentation and todo list

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: Rene Pijlman <rpijlman(at)wanadoo(dot)nl>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: JDBC 2.0 conformance, documentation and todo list
Date: 2001-08-10 15:07:04
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0108101701431.703-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Barry Lind writes:

> I don't see any problem with claiming support for entry level even
> though there are a few exceptions.

I might be able to agree if the only exceptions were that we fold
identifier case the wrong way and have different reserved words, but
certain things like schemas are rather largish exceptions.

I'm not really sure what the point of this function is anyway. We could
leave it as "false" perpetually as a means of protest against the
contortions of the SQL standard. ;-)

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Liam Stewart 2001-08-10 15:07:45 DatabaseMetaData
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-10 14:41:54 Re: [PATCHES] JDBC Statement cleanup patch