Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I'm not seeing the point. You're essentially duplicating the information
> > that's already available in the system catalogs. This is bound to become
> > a catastrophe the minute a user steps in and does manual surgery on some
> > catalog. (And yes, manual surgery should still be possible.)
>
> But how then do you find the system table that uses the given oid?
It's implied by the column you're looking at.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter