| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_depend |
| Date: | 2001-07-17 13:00:50 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0107171458100.678-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> > That was me. The point, however, was, given object id 145928, how the
> > heck to you know what table this comes from?
>
> I think we will need the relid of the system table. I imagine four
> columns:
>
> object relid
> object oid
> reference relid
> references oid
I'm not seeing the point. You're essentially duplicating the information
that's already available in the system catalogs. This is bound to become
a catastrophe the minute a user steps in and does manual surgery on some
catalog. (And yes, manual surgery should still be possible.)
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luis Sousa | 2001-07-17 13:15:03 | Operator *= |
| Previous Message | Phillip F Jansen | 2001-07-17 06:51:47 | Re: PGSQL problem with weblogic and OID data type |