Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)zembu(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)
Date: 2001-07-11 16:15:13
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0107111814370.679-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Right. Okay, it seems like just making it a hand-configurable entry
> in config.h.in is good enough for now. When and if we find that
> that's inadequate in a real-world situation, we can improve on it...

Would anything computed from the maximum number of allowed connections
make sense?

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2001-07-11 16:17:12 Re: varchar vs. text
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2001-07-11 16:14:58 RE: JDBC and stored procedures