Re: use GUC for cmdline

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: use GUC for cmdline
Date: 2001-06-20 15:43:07
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0106201737310.725-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Marko Kreen writes:

> I have not fixed the '-o -F', for which the reason is that
> 'fsync' var has in guc.c context of PGC_SIGHUP. Another
> such variable is 'log_connections' - it has PGC_SIGHUP
> and in same time is command-line settable.
>
> How should this be fixed? Simpliest would be to change those
> to PGC_BACKEND.

No. PGC_BACKEND settings have no permission check, because users can pass
them in from the client with the PGOPTIONS environment variable. The fix
might involve a non-trivial rearrangement of the way PGOPTIONS is
processed (might be impossible, because PGC_BACKEND might be useless if
the setting will only happen after the first table access (pg_shadow)) or
another context level (might be too much work for one case). At the
moment you might want to just cheat and fix the context at PGC_POSTMASTER
for this particular case.

> But what exactly means PGC_SIGHUP in ConfigureNames arrays? ATM I am
> confused. In set_config_option it seems it should equal to either
> PGC_BACKEND or PGC_POSTMASTER only has different error handling. But
> why PGC_SIGHUP in ConfigureNames?

See include/utils/guc.h

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rainer Mager 2001-06-20 22:19:54 RE: High memory usage
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2001-06-20 15:35:55 Re: High memory usage