Re: Re: Improving pg_hba.conf

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Improving pg_hba.conf
Date: 2001-06-13 15:40:11
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0106131739450.756-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

mlw writes:

> Why doesn't postgres put the contents pg_hba.conf in a table? That way it comes
> for free when you reinitialize and restore a database?

Because if you hosed that table you would have hosed your entire
installation.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Pilosov 2001-06-13 15:49:03 Re: SELECT Field1 || Field2 FROM Table
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-06-13 15:39:38 Re: Re: Improving pg_hba.conf