| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Smaller access privilege changes |
| Date: | 2001-05-24 20:05:44 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0105242201130.757-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> A different tack is to go ahead and make the change now, but try to
> ensure we won't have to change the coding again when we do the rest of
> the SQL protection model. Do you know what is still missing given this
> change?
I don't think this will end up being the user-visible interface. We
should have a view, perhaps as part of the standard information_schema,
that users can query for privilege information. So for now I'll leave the
old letters the way they are and just add a few new ones.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-05-24 20:51:06 | Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem |
| Previous Message | Chris Bowlby | 2001-05-24 19:33:10 | Re: [HACKERS] HP Unix 11.00 Compiler error. |