| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Maintaining HISTORY |
| Date: | 2001-05-17 20:21:44 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0105172209350.757-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I've been noticing that the information in the HISTORY file is regularly
incomplete, not understandable, and mostly useless except for "wow, look
what we've done" purposes. When we get to a release a year from now
(*grin*) I'm sure the dynamic_library_path thing is going to end up under
"shared library fixes".
Wouldn't it be better if the author (or committer) of a user visible
change would himself add a snippet to the release notes?
The additional benefit would be that users that get intermediate
development sources would have an idea what's been going on in between.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-17 20:37:17 | Re: Maintaining HISTORY |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-05-17 19:25:20 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/backend/uti ... |