Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
Date: 2001-03-22 16:16:03
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0103221714510.1208-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

Larry Rosenman writes:

> cc -G -Wl,-z,text -Wl,-h,libpsqlodbc.so.0 -Wl,-Bsymbolic info.o bind.o columninfo.o connection.o convert.o drvconn.o environ.o execute.o lobj.o misc.o options.o pgtypes.o psqlodbc.o qresult.o results.o socket.o parse.o statement.o gpps.o tuple.o tuplelist.o dlg_specific.o -lm -Wl,-R/usr/local/pgsql/lib -o libpsqlodbc.so.0.26
> UX:ld: ERROR: psqlodbc.o: symbol: '_fini' multiply defined; also in file /usr/ccs/lib/crti.o
> gmake[3]: *** [libpsqlodbc.so.0.26] Error 1

This is a known portability problem on Unixware (at least known to me) and
probably other non-GCC setups.

> Why do WE define _fini?

Because we need to 'fini' something, I suspect.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-22 16:16:14 Re: pgindent run?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-22 16:14:23 Re: pgindent run?

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-22 16:20:11 Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2001-03-22 16:08:05 Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.