From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. |
Date: | 2001-03-22 16:16:03 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0103221714510.1208-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc |
Larry Rosenman writes:
> cc -G -Wl,-z,text -Wl,-h,libpsqlodbc.so.0 -Wl,-Bsymbolic info.o bind.o columninfo.o connection.o convert.o drvconn.o environ.o execute.o lobj.o misc.o options.o pgtypes.o psqlodbc.o qresult.o results.o socket.o parse.o statement.o gpps.o tuple.o tuplelist.o dlg_specific.o -lm -Wl,-R/usr/local/pgsql/lib -o libpsqlodbc.so.0.26
> UX:ld: ERROR: psqlodbc.o: symbol: '_fini' multiply defined; also in file /usr/ccs/lib/crti.o
> gmake[3]: *** [libpsqlodbc.so.0.26] Error 1
This is a known portability problem on Unixware (at least known to me) and
probably other non-GCC setups.
> Why do WE define _fini?
Because we need to 'fini' something, I suspect.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-22 16:16:14 | Re: pgindent run? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-22 16:14:23 | Re: pgindent run? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-22 16:20:11 | Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. |
Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2001-03-22 16:08:05 | Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. |