| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/SQL-to-PL/pgSQL-HOWTO |
| Date: | 2001-02-27 15:44:16 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0102271642160.756-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Ross J. Reedstrom writes:
> Actually, that's a good question. We've had the regular go-arounds on
> HACKERs regarding code licensing (short answer: it'll stay BSD for the
> forseeable future), but never discussed documentation licenses.
This is easy:
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written agreement
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this
paragraph and the following two paragraphs appear in all copies.
> The 'source code' for a doc is easily recoverable from the distributed
> 'compiled' version, unlike the case for software.
Have you ever looked at a PS or PDF file lately? ;-)
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-27 15:58:36 | Re: PL/SQL-to-PL/pgSQL-HOWTO |
| Previous Message | Tew Chiz Sheng | 2001-02-27 10:19:21 | 404! Page not found |