Bruce Momjian writes:
> No, we have no ability to randomly pick rows to use for estimating
> statistics. Should we have this ability?
How's reading a sufficiently large fraction of random rows going to be
significantly faster than reading all rows? If you're just going to read
the first n rows then that isn't really random, is it?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/