| From: | "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL SQL mailing list <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: abstract data types? |
| Date: | 2001-01-21 05:13:25 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0101210012040.6839-100000@chapelperilous.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> None, I fear. The stuff you are fooling with is leftover from the old
> PostQuel language. Most of it is suffering from bit rot, because the
> developers' focus has been on SQL92 compliance for the last six or seven
> years. I hadn't realized that SQL99 had caught up to PostQuel in this
> area ;-). Sounds like we will have to dust off some of that stuff and
> get it working again. No promises about timeframe, unless someone
> steps up to the plate to do the work...
What goes around comes around. :-)
-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/~bmccoy/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
mixed emotions:
Watching a bus-load of lawyers plunge off a cliff.
With five empty seats.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Wagner | 2001-01-21 11:03:59 | #DELETED error when using Access 2000 as frontend |
| Previous Message | John Reid | 2001-01-21 05:00:46 | abstract data types? |