Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?
Date: 2001-01-20 18:57:00
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0101201936090.1033-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >> Er, what will you ifdef exactly,
>
> > + #ifdef __cplusplus

#ifndef, I meant. I.e., only declare it when in C, since libpq++ does not
use it. libpq doesn't use it either, but it uses tons of strerror().

> > #ifdef HAVE_SYS_NERR
> > extern int sys_nerr;
> > #endif
> > + #endif
>
> >> and what are the odds that it will fail on some other platform?
>
> > I don't see how it would fail. At least it won't add more possible
> > failure cases.
>
> If that can't fail, why do we need to provide a declaration of sys_nerr
> at all?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-20 19:18:55 Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-20 18:31:49 Re: [PATCHES] binary operators on integers