| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? |
| Date: | 2001-01-20 18:57:00 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0101201936090.1033-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >> Er, what will you ifdef exactly,
>
> > + #ifdef __cplusplus
#ifndef, I meant. I.e., only declare it when in C, since libpq++ does not
use it. libpq doesn't use it either, but it uses tons of strerror().
> > #ifdef HAVE_SYS_NERR
> > extern int sys_nerr;
> > #endif
> > + #endif
>
> >> and what are the odds that it will fail on some other platform?
>
> > I don't see how it would fail. At least it won't add more possible
> > failure cases.
>
> If that can't fail, why do we need to provide a declaration of sys_nerr
> at all?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-20 19:18:55 | Re: C++ interface build on FreeBSD 4.2 broken? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-20 18:31:49 | Re: [PATCHES] binary operators on integers |