Re: BLOB problem

From: "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Cornelia Boenigk <poppcorn(at)cornelia-boenigk(dot)de>
Cc: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rens Admiraal <postgresnews(at)etraned(dot)nl>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BLOB problem
Date: 2004-02-04 07:23:29
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0402040719000.10497-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Cornelia Boenigk wrote:

> Hello
>
> > I've encountered a problem with a PostgreSQL database
>
> Are you sure that the problem is with PostgreSQL?
>
> I was testing pg_lo_import() with PHP 4.3.x and found it buggy. I had
> the opposite problem: only a few bytes from a large object were stored
> in the database. Then I downgraded to PHP 4.2 and the same script
> works well on the same database.

I never had any problems with LOs on a php 4.3.x <--> Postrgresql system I was
working on last year. There must have been something else happening that isn't
attributable to use of LOs.

--
Nigel J. Andrews

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lincoln Yeoh 2004-02-04 07:50:22 Re: postmaster growing to consume all memory
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-02-04 07:10:14 Re: pg_generate_sequence and info_schema patch (Was: SELECT