Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3
Date: 2003-07-23 00:28:33
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0307231027001.817-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Andrew,
>
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:13:34AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > "If you tried PostgreSQL before, and it wasn't quite fast enough,
> > > and you went with Oracle, it's time to re-evaluate," suggests Rod
> >
> > Can I suggest you use "something else" instead of "Oracle"? I know
> > it's weasely, but Oracle has lawyers and they're not afraid to use
> > them.
>
> How could Oracle sue us for claiming to be as good or faster? MySQL does
> this all the time, and I don't see that it's landed them in any legal hot
> water.

Its not a fair statement and it is not rigorously proven. As such, I'd go
for a more generalised statement.

Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2003-07-23 01:43:50 Re: New Poll @ Codewalkers
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-22 23:18:24 Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3