| From: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] "Adding missing from clause" (replacement) |
| Date: | 2003-05-01 17:04:49 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0305011804030.26465-200000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Someone slap me, here's the patch attached this time...
On Thu, 1 May 2003, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> On Thu, 1 May 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > "Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > > * Add enable_implicited_join GUC, defaulting to true. Emit notice if
> > > enabled, throw error if disabled when adding implicit RTE.
> >
> > I'd call it "enable_implicit_from", I think, but otherwise this seems
> > reasonable...
>
> Fair enough, I'm not particularly sold on my choice so here's a replacement
> patch with the GUC name changed. If there's a problem it'll probably be because
> I edited the patch and not the source.
>
> Log:
>
> * Add enable_implicit_from GUC, defaulting to true. Emit notice if
> enabled, throw error if disabled when adding implicit RTE.
>
--
Nigel J. Andrews
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| enable_implicit_join.patch | text/plain | 3.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-01 17:32:11 | Re: select ... into question |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2003-05-01 16:53:43 | select ... into question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-05-01 20:13:08 | GUC patch for Win32 |
| Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-05-01 16:50:56 | Re: [HACKERS] "Adding missing from clause" (replacement) |