| From: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Tuning Results |
| Date: | 2003-02-12 05:19:30 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0302121616330.30946-100000@linuxworld.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Hi Chris,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Machine:
> 256MB RAM, FreeBSD 4.7, EIDE HDD, > 1 Ghz
Seems like a small amount of memory to be memory based tests with.
What about testing sort_mem as well. It would system to me that there
would be no negative to having infinite sort_mem given infinite memory,
though.
Gavin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-12 05:27:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re: |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-02-12 05:08:38 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Tuning Results |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-12 05:27:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re: |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-12 05:12:03 | Re: Hash grouping, aggregates |