Re: Hash grouping, aggregates

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hash grouping, aggregates
Date: 2003-02-12 05:12:03
Message-ID: 830.1045026723@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> Relying on hash aggregation will become essential if we are ever going
> to implement the "other" groupings (CUBE, ROLLUP, (), ...), so it would
> be nice if hash aggregation could also overflow to disk

I did not make this happen, but it sounds like Joe and Natassa are
about to send their students out to do it ... in a month or so, we
can review the homework assignments and decide who gets an A ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2003-02-12 05:19:30 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Tuning Results
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-02-12 05:08:38 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Tuning Results