Re: timeout implementation issues

From: Jessica Perry Hekman <jphekman(at)dynamicdiagrams(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues
Date: 2002-04-02 16:13:19
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0204021112230.11943-100000@atalanta.dynamicdiagrams.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> On the other hand, we do not have anything in the backend now that
> applies to just one statement and then automatically resets afterwards;
> and I'm not eager to add a parameter with that behavior just for JDBC's
> convenience. It seems like it'd be a big wart.

Does that leave us with implementing query timeouts in JDBC (timer in the
driver; then the driver sends a cancel request to the backend)?

j

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Emberson 2002-04-02 17:00:11 Re: v7.2.1 Released: Critical Bug Fix
Previous Message Reinoud van Leeuwen 2002-04-02 16:09:26 status of IPv6 Support for INET/CIDR types