Re: DRDA, network protocol, and documentation

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Brian Bruns <camber(at)ais(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DRDA, network protocol, and documentation
Date: 2002-02-07 05:02:10
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0202071559370.2160-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Brian Bruns wrote:

> I also noticed on the TODO list someone has put SQL*Net support as a
> network protocol. Is this a serious plan or just a pipedream? Part of
> what I'm aiming to do is make the network protocol stuff fairly modular so
> you could support the current protocol, and DRDA, and presumably SQL*Net
> or TDS (Microsoft/Sybases protocol), etc...

I intend on looking into ways to implement SQL*Net/TNS etc. It's not
pretty but would be remarkably useful. I haven't started looking at it
yet because PostgreSQL doesn't support all of the Oracle's SQL
implementation. Until this happens there's really not much point.

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-02-07 05:15:15 Re: Suggestions for 7.3 date handling
Previous Message Haroldo Stenger 2002-02-07 05:00:11 Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server