Re: bug in permission handling?

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Martin Renters <martin(at)datafax(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bug in permission handling?
Date: 2002-01-26 08:09:32
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0201261909130.22690-100000@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > I was going to run up a patch for this, but it wold be premature given
> > the introduction of schemas in 7.3. Once implemented, it would be trivial
> > to add a test of schema ownership and incorporate this into the idea
> > above.
>
> Unfortunately, looking into databases you aren't connected to is far
> from trivial. As long as users span multiple databases this problem
> is not really soluble...

Argh. Of course, my bad.

Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Rajkumar 2002-01-26 09:56:02 libpq - main symbol unresolved.
Previous Message Justin Clift 2002-01-26 08:08:22 Re: sequence indexes