I was under the impression that vacuum was multi-user safe. It does table locking so you don't have to worry about concurrency corrupting your data. It just might take longer (either to vacuum or for a user to get a response)
cheers,
t.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Andy Samuel wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a way to do the vacuum, but without throwing away active users ?
>
> TIA
> Andy
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>