| From: | Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Paul Tomblin <ptomblin(at)xcski(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: BETWEEN clause |
| Date: | 2001-04-24 22:22:10 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0104241819550.22793-100000@olympus.scw.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-novice |
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> Quoting Bruce Momjian (pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us):
> >
> > If someone can think of a clearer way to present it, we are all ears.
>
> Speaking for myself, the problem isn't that the information in \? isn't
> helpful, it's that I was expecting something more like "SHOW TABLE" or
> "DESCRIBE" which is how it's done on the previous couple of SQL dbmses
> I've used.
The challenge is that, for some databases, the database server itself
parses these commands, where, for PG, \d is turned into perfectly normal
PG queries to the system catalogs. (psql -E will let you see this
happening.)
I like our way much better -- once you've learned a bit about the system
tables, you can use them in any query, etc. However, many new users do try
DESCRIBE, etc.
Would it be worthwhile for psql / PG parser to notice these attempts and
bleat out some help? It doesn't quite seem worthwhile to me, but perhaps
others think it is.
--
Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>
Director of Information Systems, Support Center of Washington
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | will trillich | 2001-04-24 22:34:58 | inheritance |
| Previous Message | Paul Tomblin | 2001-04-24 22:01:45 | Re: Re: BETWEEN clause |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joel Burton | 2001-04-24 22:25:31 | Re: case insensitive database ? |
| Previous Message | Thorsten Mauch | 2001-04-24 22:06:59 | case insensitive database ? |