| From: | Tim Allen <tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martin Devera <devik(at)cdi(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WAL & SHM principles |
| Date: | 2001-03-08 09:44:13 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0103082041350.2380-100000@bee.proximity.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Martin Devera wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Unfortunately, this alone is a *fatal* objection. See nearby
> > > discussions about WAL behavior: we must be able to control the relative
> > > timing of WAL write/flush and data page writes.
> >
> > Bummer.
> >
> BTW, what means "bummer" ?
It's a Postgres-specific extension to the SQL standard. It means "I am
disappointed". As far as I can tell, you _may_ use it as a column or table
name. :-)
Tim
--
-----------------------------------------------
Tim Allen tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au
Proximity Pty Ltd http://www.proximity.com.au/
http://www4.tpg.com.au/users/rita_tim/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karel Zak | 2001-03-08 10:26:02 | Re: Performance monitor |
| Previous Message | Martin Devera | 2001-03-08 08:55:09 | Re: WAL & SHM principles |