From: | Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Marek Pętlicki <marpet(at)buy(dot)pl> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql for Python |
Date: | 2001-03-02 19:16:02 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0103021414530.15422-100000@olympus.scw.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-2] Marek Ptlicki wrote:
> Has anybody used http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgsql ?
> I maintain production system based on Python and PostgreSQL.
>
> I currently use PoPy, but for a few reasons it doesn't satysfy me fully.
> The pgsql seems OK at first sight (especially libpq-to-Python API) but
> for the production system I need Python DB API 2.0 compliant library.
> Has anybody tested it yet? What is the status of PostgreSQL 7.1
> compliance for today?
>
> Any Python geeks out here? ;-)
Partially a Python geek here.
I use PoPy and think it's dandy. I also thought it *was* the DB API 2.0--
am I mistaken here?
PyGreSQL is more commonly used, and has (IMHO) a simpler, more dict-like
interface, but isn't (AFAIK) thread-safe, nor DB API compliant.
--
Joel Burton <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>
Director of Information Systems, Support Center of Washington
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2001-03-02 19:20:27 | Re: Re: serial properties |
Previous Message | Martin A. Marques | 2001-03-02 19:13:38 | Re: user/group creation privileges |