From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Coming attractions: VPATH build; make variables issue |
Date: | 2000-10-18 19:43:05 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0010182135240.3228-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> > dep depend:
> > $(CC) -MM $(CFLAGS) *.c >depend
>
> Why? Shouldn't CFLAGS include CPPFLAGS?
Nope. That's what it does now, but the implicit rule is
%.o: %.c
$(CC) -c $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
so if you set CFLAGS to include CPPFLAGS then you get all of it
double. So I have to fix all the rules to say
dep depend:
$(CC) -MM $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) *.c >depend
I just notice that the workaround I had in mind won't work so well, so I
guess I'll have to fix it the hard way.
> These targets seem correct to me as they stand ... other than assuming
> CC is gcc, but nevermind that...
I'd be glad to add support for other compilers into the --enable-depend
mechanism, if someone supplies the details.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-10-18 19:44:46 | Re: pgsql/doc (FAQ_MSWIN INSTALL_MSWIN) |
Previous Message | Travis Bauer | 2000-10-18 18:28:37 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_connect error |