| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | CFLAGS vs CPPFLAGS, or The future of `make depend' |
| Date: | 2000-09-08 17:19:21 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0009081918180.345-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Targets of the form
depend dep:
$(CC) -MM $(CFLAGS) *.c >depend
are wrong, there should be at least a $(CPPFLAGS) in there. In fact, the
whole CPPFLAGS vs CFLAGS issue is completely messed up, in case you ever
wondered why you get duplicate `-I' options on the compile line.
Now the variable naming issue I want to fix, but I wonder whether it's
worth fixing the `depend' targets. After all, they have been replaced by
something better now. To be clear: fixing the variable naming without
fixing the depend targets would break the depend targets, it's just a
decision about the amount of work.
Any comments?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-09-08 17:20:04 | "Pre-7" odbc extension files |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-09-08 17:17:28 | Trigger functions don't obey "strict" setting? |