Re: 7.1 Release Date

From: Andreas Tille <tillea(at)rki(dot)de>
To: Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)range(dot)infoplease(dot)com>
Cc: user Postgresql ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.1 Release Date
Date: 2000-09-06 14:49:48
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0009061642590.19267-100000@wr-linux02.rki.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Karl DeBisschop wrote:

> Having done both Redhat and debian installs, I have to say I'm much more
> fond of Redhat's process. In a work environment, you need to be able to
> put the CD in the server that sits in the server room, then walk away. A
> redhat install takes half an hour. When I did a debian install at home
> it took days, mostly because the machine kept waiting for me to answer
> some silly little question. Redhat has it's pitfalls as well -- overall
> I'm pretty neutral over which I prefer, but there are important virtues
> to Redhat's strategy.
To be exact: The *old* Debian strategy. Debconf in Potato (2.2) does
a great job and will be even better in the future. There exist's also
an project called FAI, which enables fully automatical install.

No intention to start a distribution flamewar, just to serve some
facts, which I have to while being a Debian maintainer ;-).
Just use your favourite distribution and have fun with the nice
PostgreSQL server.

Kind regards

Andreas.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cristian D. GAL 2000-09-06 14:54:55 Question
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-09-06 14:44:32 Re: Large selects handled inefficiently?