Re: libpq / SQL3

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq / SQL3
Date: 2000-07-09 21:29:35
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0007091825340.10288-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Bitmead writes:

> Can anybody (i.e Peter :) provide any insight on how the SQL99 API
> handles variable length datatypes where you don't know the length in a
> particular tuple in advance?

Clause 5.9 "Character string retrieval" might provide some insight,
although it's probably not what you had hoped for.

T = target (where you want to store it)
L = length of value
V = the value

b) Otherwise, let NB be the length in octets of a null
terminator in the character set of T.

Case:

i) If L is not greater than (TL-NB), then the first (L+NB)
octets of T are set to V concatenated with a single
implementation-defined null character that terminates a
C character string. The values of the remaining characters
of T are implementation-dependent.

ii) Otherwise, T is set to the first (TL-NB) octets of V
concatenated with a single implementation-defined null
character that terminates a C character string and a
-=> completion condition is raised: warning - string data,
-=> right truncation.

So highly robust applications would have to call DescribeCol before any
GetData or similar call in order to allocate a sufficiently sized buffer.
Which is a problem if DescribeCol doesn't know about user-defined data
types.

But remember that SQL does not provide any variable-without-limit length
types, so there is theoretically never any uncertainty about what kind of
buffer to allocate if you know the query.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Teuber 2000-07-09 23:02:52 mailing list archive dead again!
Previous Message Louis Bertrand 2000-07-09 20:29:52 PostgreSQL vs. MySQL