Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
Date: 2000-06-26 01:41:50
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0006251642130.11966-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Tom Lane writes:

> What surprises me more is the implication that this is the only place
> that makes such a bogus assumption about the size of time_t. I'd have
> guessed there are more places...

A lot of those were fixed for 7.0.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-26 01:41:58 Re: [HACKERS] CLASSOID patch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-26 01:41:41 Re: About the pid and opts files

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-06-26 03:31:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-26 01:41:12 .exe extension on Windows