RE: boolean isn't boolean?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Marc Britten <mbritten(at)cybernet-usa(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: boolean isn't boolean?
Date: 2000-06-24 11:56:35
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0006231929340.484-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Marc Britten writes:

> language-lawyer version.. you used the wrong version of the lang, the docs
> say it complies to SQL3, which has completely different wording than SQL99

SQL3 isn't a standard, the term used to be employed to mean "the potential
successor to ISO/IEC 9075:1992", which turned out to be ISO/IEC 9075:1999,
which is what I quoted.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Lawrence 2000-06-24 16:03:43 MySQL Command Comparison
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-24 11:56:02 Re: boolean isn't boolean?