| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)Wien(dot)Spardat(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'PostgreSQL Development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: AW: AW: Proposal for enhancements of privilege syst em |
| Date: | 2000-06-07 23:21:15 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0006080026290.16917-100000@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes:
> Remember that you can be granted a certain priviledge by more than
> one grantor, thus your key was not correct to begin with.
Oh, good catch. That will put things in perspective.
> I actually didn't mean real arrays, but e.g. a char(n) where each position
> marks a certain priv. e.g. "SU-ID---" = with grant option, "su-id---"
> without grant options.
Hmm, yes, that seems like a good idea. (Of course we'll run out of letters
before we have taken care of UPDATE, UNDER, USAGE. :)
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Simms | 2000-06-08 01:16:03 | Re: Apparent deadlock 7.0.1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-07 23:16:13 | Re: Apparent deadlock 7.0.1 |