Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: few more securiry questions :-)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: R D <mrk279(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: few more securiry questions :-)
Date: 2000-05-31 19:34:53
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0005312104010.701-100000@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-admin
R D writes:

> 1.I think it will be good pgSQL to accept the 
> "REVOKE ALL ON * FROM SOMEUSER;" so are there 
> any plans in implementing this? Does anybody knows?

I think so too. We'll take it under advisement.

> 2.Why the authentication system is not integrated in
> the system databases of pgSQL,like in MySQL for
> example? 

Because there's a bootstrapping problem: You would have to connect to the
database to change the authentication settings, but in order to connect
you have to be authenticated.

> 3.Are there any plans in making security system more
> flexible?

Sure. I'm planning some work on that very soon. Any suggestions you might
want to contribute?

Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net                   75262 Uppsala            Sweden

In response to


pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-05-31 19:35:01
Subject: Re: create view security
Previous:From: Chris AlbertsonDate: 2000-05-31 17:57:46
Subject: Re: table size limit under Linux

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group