Re: config files in /data

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: config files in /data
Date: 2000-05-31 19:34:44
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0005312055490.701-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Rather than restricting database names, we should keep these files in
> a different subdirectory. I agree that it's a good idea to separate
> them from the directly-editable config files, just not to put them in
> data/base/ ...

Right. How about `$PGDATA/internal'? Can't be more obvious. Perhaps with
that we could also have initdb clean up a little more respectfully.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-31 19:43:10 Re: config files in /data
Previous Message Jeff MacDonald 2000-05-31 19:00:55 Re: [HACKERS] Re: 7.0 weirdness