Re: psql \l error

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: SAKAIDA <sakaida(at)psn(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql \l error
Date: 2000-05-03 23:10:59
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0005030025570.362-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Looking at less generic answers, I suppose that psql could try to use
> a 7.0-compatible query and fall back to a 6.5-compatible query if that
> fails. I imagine Peter will class this answer as "too ugly to live" ;-).

Until there is at least a glimpse of error codes I'd say it's "too
incorrect to live" ...

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-05-03 23:19:33 Re: \h behaviour - strange ?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-05-03 23:10:27 Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea