Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Date: 2000-03-04 17:06:43
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.21.0003040434200.489-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Karel Zak - Zakkr writes:

> > I read about that in SQL3 yesterday and I think we could transparently
> > adapt the current group scheme to it.
>
> Sorry, I skip this part in my previous letter. Why you mean adaptation
> to current group scheme?

I said adapt the current group scheme to roles. The current groups are a
functional subset of what roles do.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-03-04 17:07:16 ACL enhancements (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-03-04 17:06:37 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)