Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux

From: Oleg Broytmann <phd(at)phd(dot)russ(dot)ru>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-announce(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux
Date: 2000-03-01 09:20:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-announcepgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> As Jeff mentioned earlier today, there is a poll going on at
> that asks:
> Several high-quality databases are available for Linux.  Which database,
> if any, does your company primarily use with its Linux servers?
> Right now, PostgreSQL is lagging MySQL 21% to 48% ...
> Who hasn't voted? :)  Get out there and make yourself heard, eh? 

   Yesterday I spent a few minutes trying to choose the DB to vote for. I
am using both Postgres and MySQL - different tasks require different
aproaches and solutions - and I am satisfied with both DBs. There are
niches for both of them.
   Finally I voted for Postgres - just because MySQL already has its votes :)

    Oleg Broytmann     phd2(at)earthling(dot)net
           Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.

In response to

pgsql-announce by date

Next:From: R.L. RussellDate: 2000-03-02 04:59:23
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-03-01 04:20:17
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Karel Zak - ZakkrDate: 2000-03-01 09:33:18
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented
Previous:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2000-03-01 07:27:21
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Compile woes

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tomaz BorstnarDate: 2000-03-01 11:23:05
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] psql 7.0.0 beta
Previous:From: Oleg BroytmannDate: 2000-03-01 09:18:19
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] order by

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group