Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux
Date: 2000-03-01 04:20:17
Message-ID: 200003010420.XAA14238@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

>
> As Jeff mentioned earlier today, there is a poll going on at
> http://www.linux.com that asks:
>
> Several high-quality databases are available for Linux. Which database,
> if any, does your company primarily use with its Linux servers?
>
> Right now, PostgreSQL is lagging MySQL 21% to 48% ...
>
> Who hasn't voted? :) Get out there and make yourself heard, eh?

Reading the web page recent comments, MySQL is getting blasted for lack
of features. Glad to see it. I think we have them on the run. They
are not advancing at the same speed as PostgreSQL, so it is only a
matter of time.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Broytmann 2000-03-01 09:20:35 Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-03-01 04:02:44 Poll: Databases for Linux

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Broytmann 2000-03-01 09:18:19 Re: [GENERAL] order by
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-03-01 04:02:44 Poll: Databases for Linux

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-03-01 05:42:14 Re: [HACKERS] minor bug in 7.0: casting
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-03-01 04:02:44 Poll: Databases for Linux